| ROI for engineers: pt 1 |
| Written by John Marchant | ||||||||||
| Monday, 25 February 2008 | ||||||||||
| Page 2 of 2
Net Present Value: NPVNow, let's say that in the phone example, you are borrowing money at 6% to fund the extra spend. What profit do you make over time, using a cost of money, and turning this into a - value? - a sort of increase in shareholders worth. This is Net Present Value, a monetary profit in today's terms, comparing costs out, savings in, and the annual cost of money. Discounted cash flow: DCFAny investment gives rise to a stream of future expected cash flows, both in and out. Cash flows out unevenly when you pay the bills for hardware, software, training, consultancy, maintenance etc. In effect, cash flows in when the expected benefits materialise and your FD will want to see your cash-flow projections. DCF converts all of these to an equivalent amount of present-day money (or present value) by discounting future cash flow. Identifying and quantifying the benefitsOf course, key to this approach is your ability to identify the benefits and quantify them (no matter how downstream or remote from you they may seem) and the point in time at which the benefits start to appear. Look for the impact on others � how will the proposed system affect purchasing or invoicing, for example. How much can you defer and reduce the buying of materials because you are making fewer prototypes? What is the cost reduction impact of getting your new products to market earlier? How much can you save on product recall or in-service modifications because you can project a reduction in the number of post design changes? You will also need to get a handle on ALL the associated costs: system hardware, software, training, implementation, consultancy and the point in time when these costs occur. Get anything wrong and your case may well fail. Err on the conservative side. It is better to underestimate and overachieve. A simple exampleSo, now that you know all three measures, if you could actually identify and quantify all the solution benefits, you can deliver a full ROI based business case to support your technical proposal. Let's see this in action! A CAD manager proposes to spend £250,000 on a complete CAD/CAE/CAM solution. The CAD manager has shown that benefits will accrue from reduced product development time, reduced stockholding, and better buying margins. The benefits total £18k per month, but the supplier would charge an extra £2k per month to deliver those benefits. Over a 36 month review period and a 10% cost of money - is this a good deal? Who can possibly tell unless we look at the three key economic measures?
It's now plain to see this makes sense and the technical decision is now supported by the financial language that business people understand. How to do itSo how can you determine the ROI? There are a number of ways: Employ a consultant Do it yourself Ask your vendor or reseller for help Use a commercially-available software tool Further information
You will find more information at the following places
Open University's Business Management course Investment Risk module B821_1 at openlearn.open.ac.uk/course/view.php?id=2599 The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, IT Forward Round Table: Return-on-investment in Information Technology www.icaew.com/index.cfm?route=115547 Next time: structure and content of a typical ROI-based business case How you can lay out the business case so that the FD can see and trust the vital ROI information of NPV, IRR, PP and DCF. John Marchant is Consulting Editor of MCAD Magazine and senior partner in the skilstream partnership, case study and return-on-investment specialists. |
||||||||||
| Next > |
|---|




